Daniels v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this Case
After a jury trial, Appellant was convicted of possession of marijuana with the intent to deliver and possession of methamphetamine with the intent to deliver. The court of appeals affirmed. Appellant filed a timely pro se petition for postconviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, denial of due process, actual or constructive denial of counsel, and denial of a fair trial. The trial court denied the petition without a hearing. The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's denial of postconviction relief, holding that, based on the record and the petition, none of Appellant's claims in the petition were meritorious.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.