Munnerlyn v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAfter a trial, Petitioner was convicted of three felony offenses and sentenced to life imprisonment. Petitioner subsequently filed a petition for leave to proceed in the trial court pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1. The Supreme Court denied relief, holding (1) Petitioner's argument that the arrest warrant was invalid was not cognizable under Rule 37.1; (2) Petitioner's argument that the felony information was invalid was not a jurisdictional matter and was not sufficient to void the judgment; (3) Petitioner's argument that he was not adequately informed of his Miranda rights when he confessed was waived; and (4) Petitioner's allegations of ineffective assistance were not grounds for relief.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.