Demeyer v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAppellant entered a negotiated plea of guilty to rape. Appellant subsequently filed a pro se petition for writ of error coram nobis, alleging that his guilty plea was coerced and that the prosecution did not provide him with a videotape of an interview with the victim in violation of Brady v. Maryland. The circuit court denied the petition after a hearing. The Supreme Court dismissed Appellant's appeal and held his pro se motion for extension of time to file his brief moot, holding (1) Appellant's first claim did not rise to the level of coercion required to demonstrate that a writ of error coram nobis should issue; and (2) Appellant was not entitled to relief on his second claim because he failed to provide any factual support for the claim.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.