Hill v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAfter a trial, Appellant was conviction of first-degree murder and sentenced as a habitual offender to 720 months' imprisonment. No appeal was taken from the judgment. Appellant subsequently filed a writ of error coram nobis, raising a number of claims. The trial court denied the writ. Appellant appealed, raising as his sole point on appeal an allegation of error concerning a claim of withheld evidence. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the trial court did not err in denying coram nobis relief where Appellant's pleading failed to demonstrate that the evidence he contended was withheld was sufficient to support issuance of the writ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.