Hill v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseIn 1995, Appellant was convicted of first-degree murder. In 2012, Appellant filed a motion "challenging statutory construction and interpretation" and seeking a "judgment of acquittal" on his conviction. The circuit court treated the motion as one for habeas relief and then dismissed the motion. The Supreme Court dismissed Appellant's appeal, holding (1) the circuit court appropriately treated Appellant's motion as one for habeas relief; (2) because Appellant was not incarcerated within that circuit court's jurisdiction, the court did not have jurisdiction to grant habeas relief; and (3) Appellant's claim of insufficient evidence failed to state grounds for habeas relief.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.