Hill v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseIn 1995, Appellant was convicted of first-degree murder. More than fifteen years after the judgment had been entered, Appellant filed a motion to vacate, set aside, and discharge his conviction seeking fingerprint testing of the gun used in the murder under Act 1780 of 2001 Acts of Arkansas. There are a number of predicate requirements that must be met before a court can order testing under the Act, including the requirement that petitioners who file a motion for testing more than thirty-six months after the entry of the judgment of conviction rebut a presumption against timeliness. The circuit court denied the motion. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction under Act 1780 to grant relief on Appellant's motion because Appellant failed to rebut the presumption against timeliness.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.