Myers v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseIn 2005, Petitioners were convicted of various drug-related offenses. Petitioners subsequently filed a pro se joint petition seeking to have jurisdiction reinvested in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis, arguing that the trial court denied them of their right to allocution before the entry of their judgments, that their counsel rendered ineffective assistance, and that they were deprived of the right to a speedy trial. The Supreme Court denied the petition, as all of Petitioners' claims were not subject to review in a coram-nobis proceeding.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.