Waller v. Norris
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2011 Ark. 168
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No.
09-623
Opinion Delivered
ROMARIO VERMOND WALLER
Appellant
v.
LARRY NORRIS
Appellee
April 14, 2011
PRO SE MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
RECORD [CIRCUIT COURT OF
LEE COUNTY, CV 2009-34, HON.
RICHARD PROCTOR, JUDGE]
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION
MOOT.
PER CURIAM
Appellant Romario Vermond Waller, an inmate incarcerated in the Arkansas
Department of Correction at the East Arkansas Regional Unit in Lee County, filed a pro se
petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Lee County Circuit Court. The court denied the
petition, and appellant lodged an appeal from the order in this court. Approximately five
months after the appeal was lodged, appellant gave notice to this court by means of a letter
that he had been transferred to the Super Maximum Security Unit located in Lincoln County.
The Department of Correction records verify the change in location.
Appellant, who remains incarcerated in Lincoln County, now seeks by pro se motion
to supplement the record on appeal. We do not reach the merits of the motion and dismiss
the appeal because the Lee County Circuit Court can no longer grant the relief requested by
appellant. Buckhanna v. Hobbs, 2011 Ark. 119 (per curiam).
Cite as 2011 Ark. 168
An appeal of the denial of postconviction relief, including an appeal from an order that
denied a petition for writ of habeas corpus, will not be permitted to go forward where it is
clear that the appellant could not prevail. Buckhanna, 2011 Ark. 119; Davis v. State, 2011 Ark.
6 (per curiam); Lukach v. State, 369 Ark. 475, 255 S.W.3d 832 (2007) (per curiam).
Any petition for writ of habeas corpus to effect the release of a prisoner is properly
addressed to the circuit court in the county in which the prisoner is held in custody, unless
the petition is filed pursuant to Act 1780 of 2001, codified at Arkansas Code Annotated §§
16-112-201 to -208 (Repl. 2006), in which case the petition is properly filed pursuant to
Arkansas Code Annotated § 16-112-201(a) in the court where the judgment of conviction
was entered. Appellant, who is incarcerated by virtue of judgments of conviction entered in
the Union County Circuit Court, did not invoke Act 1780.
A circuit court does not have jurisdiction to release on a writ of habeas corpus a
prisoner not in custody in that court’s jurisdiction. Buckhanna, 2011 Ark. 119; Hill v. State,
2010 Ark. 102 (per curiam); Pardue v. State, 338 Ark. 606, 999 S.W.2d 198 (1999) (per
curiam) (citing Mackey v. Lockhart, 307 Ark. 321, 819 S.W.2d 702 (1991)). Regardless of the
merits of appellant’s petition, appellant cannot now prevail on appeal. Accordingly, the appeal
is dismissed, and the motion to supplement the record is moot.
Appeal dismissed; motion moot.
2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.