Barnett v. Burl
Annotate this Case
Justia Opinion Summary
Want to stay in the know about new opinions from the Arkansas Supreme Court?
Sign up for free summaries delivered directly to your inbox. Learn More ›
You already receive new opinion summaries from Arkansas Supreme Court. Did you know we offer summary newsletters for even more practice areas and jurisdictions? Explore them here.
Appellant Matthew Barnett, an inmate incarcerated in a Department of Correction facility in Lee County, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Lee County circuit court. The court denied the petition. Appellant appealed. Before the Supreme Court was Appellant's motion for leave to file a supplemental reply brief on appeal. After the motion was filed, Appellant was released from custody and was living in Pulaski County. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and declared the motion moot because Appellant was no longer within the jurisdiction of the circuit court in which he filed his petition.
Download PDF
Cite as 2011 Ark. 483 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. 11-491 Opinion Delivered MATTHEW W. BARNETT APPELLANT V. DANNY BURL, WARDEN APPELLEE November 10, 2011 PRO SE APPELLANT S MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF [LEE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, CV 2011-47, HON. RICHARD L. PROCTOR, JUDGE] APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION MOOT. PER CURIAM On March 29, 2011, appellant Matthew W. Barnett, an inmate incarcerated in an Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) facility in Lee County, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Lee County Circuit Court. The court denied the petition, and appellant lodged an appeal from the order in this court. Now before us is appellant s motion for leave to file a supplemental reply brief on appeal. After the motion was filed, appellant telephoned one of our staff attorneys to advise that he had been released from custody and was living in Pulaski County. He also faxed his new address to our clerk s office. The Records Office of the ADC has confirmed that appellant has indeed been released from custody. We do not reach the merits of the motion and dismiss the appeal because the Lee County Circuit Court can no longer grant the relief requested by appellant. Smith v. Norris, 2011 Ark. 331 (per curiam); Jackson v. Norris, 2011 Ark. 298 (per curiam); Waller v. Norris, 2011 Ark. 168 (per curiam); Buckhanna v. Hobbs, 2011 Ark. 119 (per curiam). An appeal of the denial of Cite as 2011 Ark. 483 postconviction relief, including an appeal from an order that denied a petition for writ of habeas corpus, will not be permitted to go forward where it is clear that the appellant could not prevail. Smith, 2011 Ark. 331; Jackson, 2011 Ark. 298; Waller, 2011 Ark. 168; Buckhanna, 2011 Ark. 119; Davis v. State, 2011 Ark. 6 (per curiam); Lukach v. State, 369 Ark. 475, 255 S.W.3d 832 (2007) (per curiam). Any petition for writ of habeas corpus to effect the release of a prisoner is properly addressed to the circuit court in the county in which the prisoner is held in custody.1 Appellant is no longer within the jurisdiction of the circuit court in which he filed his petition. A circuit court does not have jurisdiction to release on a writ of habeas corpus a prisoner not in custody in that court s jurisdiction. Smith, 2011 Ark. 331; Jackson, 2011 Ark. 298; Waller, 2011 Ark. 168; Buckhanna, 2011 Ark. 119; Hill v. State, 2010 Ark. 102 (per curiam); Pardue v. State, 338 Ark. 606, 999 S.W.2d 198 (1999) (per curiam) (citing Mackey v. Lockhart, 307 Ark. 321, 819 S.W.2d 702 (1991)). Even if appellant s petition had merit, and the circuit court erred in dismissing it, appellant cannot now prevail on appeal. Smith, 2011 Ark. 331; Jackson, 2011 Ark. 298; Waller, 2011 Ark. 168; Buckhanna, 2011 Ark. 119. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, and the motion is moot. Appeal dismissed; motion moot. 1 There is an exception for petitioners claiming the right to be released on a writ of habeas corpus on the ground of actual innocence under Act 1780 of 2001, codified at Arkansas Code Annotated sections 16-112-201 to -208 (Repl. 2006). Pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-112-201(a), such petitions are filed in the court where the judgment of conviction was entered. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
