Chappell v. Hobbs
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2011 Ark. 220
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No. 11-82
Opinion Delivered
DANIEL CHAPPELL, JR.
APPELLANT
v.
May 12, 2011
PRO SE MOTIONS TO ATTACH
ADDENDUM TO REPLY BRIEF AND
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
REPLY BRIEF [JACKSON COUNTY
CIRCUIT COURT, CV 2010-48, HON.
HAROLD ERWIN, JUDGE]
RAY HOBBS
APPELLEE
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS MOOT.
PER CURIAM
In 2010, appellant Daniel Chappell, Jr., an inmate incarcerated in the Arkansas Department
of Correction at the Grimes Unit in Jackson County, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus
in the Jackson County Circuit Court. The court denied the petition, and appellant lodged an appeal
from the order in this court.
On April 14, 2011, appellant filed the motions that are now before us, seeking leave to
attach an addendum to his reply brief and an extension of time to file the reply brief. His
address on the motions reflected that he has been transferred to another unit of the
department, the Pine Bluff Unit in Jefferson County. We do not reach the merits of the
motions and dismiss the appeal because the Jackson County Circuit Court can no longer grant
the relief requested by appellant. Waller v. Norris, 2011 Ark. 168 (per curiam); Buckhanna v.
Hobbs, 2011 Ark. 119 (per curiam).
An appeal of the denial of postconviction relief, including an appeal from an order that
denied a petition for writ of habeas corpus, will not be permitted to go forward where it is
Cite as 2011 Ark. 220
clear that the appellant could not prevail. Waller, 2011 Ark. 168; Buckhanna, 2011 Ark. 119;
Davis v. State, 2011 Ark. 6 (per curiam); Lukach v. State, 369 Ark. 475, 255 S.W.3d 832
(2007) (per curiam).
Any petition for writ of habeas corpus to effect the release of a prisoner is properly
addressed to the circuit court in the county in which the prisoner is held in custody, unless
the petition is filed pursuant to Act 1780 of 2001, codified at Arkansas Code Annotated §§
16-112-201 to -208 (Repl. 2006), in which case the petition is properly filed pursuant to
Arkansas Code Annotated § 16-112-201(a) in the court where the judgment of conviction
was entered. Appellant, who is incarcerated by virtue of a judgment of conviction entered in
the Washington County Circuit Court, did not invoke Act 1780. By the time appellant filed
the instant motions, he was in custody in Jefferson County, where he is currently incarcerated.
The records of the Department of Correction verify the change in location.
A circuit court does not have jurisdiction to release on a writ of habeas corpus a
prisoner not in custody in that court’s jurisdiction. Waller, 2011 Ark. 168; Buckhanna, 2011
Ark. 119; Hill v. State, 2010 Ark. 102 (per curiam); Pardue v. State, 338 Ark. 606, 999 S.W.2d
198 (1999) (per curiam) (citing Mackey v. Lockhart, 307 Ark. 321, 819 S.W.2d 702 (1991)).
Even if appellant’s petition had merit and the circuit court erred in dismissing it, appellant
cannot now prevail on appeal. Waller, 2011 Ark. 168; Buckhanna, 2011 Ark. 119. Accordingly,
the appeal is dismissed, and the motions are moot.
Appeal dismissed; motions moot.
2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
