Holsombach v. Reynolds
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
No.
CR 09-379
Opinion Delivered
May 14, 2009
PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF
MANDAMUS [CIRCUIT COURT OF
VAN BUREN COUNTY, CR 2004-30,
CR 2004-121]
MARK HOLSOMBACH
Petitioner
v.
HON. DAVID REYNOLDS, CIRCUIT
JUDGE
Respondent
PETITION MOOT.
PER CURIAM
Now before us is a pro se petition for writ of mandamus filed in this court on April 14, 2009,
by petitioner Mark Holsombach. On February 20, 2007, petitioner filed in the trial court a pro se
petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1. He
contends that the Honorable David Reynolds, respondent herein, has failed to act on the petition in
a timely manner. He asks this court to direct the respondent to make a ruling on the Rule 37.1
petition.
On April 20, 2009, Judge Reynolds filed a response to the mandamus petition. Appended
thereto was a file-marked copy of his order entered on March 13, 2008, that denied the petition. As
the court has acted on the Rule 37.1 petition, the instant petition for writ of mandamus is moot.
Petition moot.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
