Willis v. Circuit Clerk of Sebastian County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2009 Ark. 515
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No.
CR 09-649
Opinion Delivered
CARL EDWARD WILLIS
Petitioner
October 22, 2009
PRO SE MOTION FOR RULE ON
CLERK OF THE ARKANSAS
SUPREME COURT [CIRCUIT COURT
OF SEBASTIAN COUNTY, FORT
SMITH DISTRICT, CR 2004-1041]
v.
CIRCUIT CLERK OF SEBASTIAN
COUNTY, FORT SMITH DISTRICT
Respondent
MOTION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
On March 16, 2009, petitioner Carl Edward Willis tendered to this court a pro se motion for
rule on the Circuit Clerk of Sebastian County, Ft. Smith District, alleging that the circuit clerk had failed
to provide him with certain certified documents that he had requested from her. As the motion
pertained to the circuit clerk, and not the clerk of this court, it was returned to petitioner in accordance
with our long-standing practice in such matters so he could proceed with it in circuit court.
Now before us is petitioner’s pro se motion for rule on the clerk of this court, asking that we
direct our clerk to file the motion here. The motion for rule on our clerk was not accompanied by a
certified record of any proceeding in circuit court.
The motion is denied. The circuit court has jurisdiction to consider a claim that its clerk should
perform a particular duty, such as provide a petitioner with certified copies of documents. Petitioner
has failed to establish that there is any basis for this court to assume jurisdiction of the matter. Arkansas
Supreme Court Rule 2-2 governing rules on clerk does not have within its purview claims that a circuit
clerk has failed to perform a duty.
Cite as 2009 Ark. 515
Motion denied.
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.