Nickolaus Hampton v. State of Arkansas

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT No. CR 07-1263 Opinion Delivered NICKOLAUS HAMPTON Appellant December 4, 2008 PETITION FOR REHEARING OR CORRECTION OF OPINION [CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, CR 2003-634, HON. CHRIS PIAZZA, JUDGE] v. STATE OF ARKANSAS Appellee PETITION DENIED. PER CURIAM Now before us is appellant’s petition for rehearing or correction of opinion. On September 18, 2008, this court affirmed the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1. Hampton v. State, CR 07-1263 (Ark. Sept. 18, 2008) (per curiam). Appellant has failed to meet his burden of demonstrating entitlement to a rehearing pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 2-3. In our opinion, we held that no fundamental or prejudicial error existed when the jury’s verdict in appellant’s criminal case was inconsistent with the verdict rendered in appellant’s codefendant’s trial. Appellant presented no error of law or fact in the decision that would merit a rehearing or correction of the opinion. Petition denied. Imber, J., not participating.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.