Michael Eugene Bradshaw v. State of Arkansas
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
No. CACR 04510
Opinion Delivered
MICHAEL EUGENE BRADSHAW
Petitioner
February 7, 2008
PRO SE MOTION FOR COPY OF
TRANSCRIPT AT PUBLIC EXPENSE
[CIRCUIT COURT OF GARLAND
COUNTY, CR 2003152]
v.
STATE OF ARKANSAS
Respondent
MOTION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
In 2003, petitioner Michael Eugene Bradshaw was found guilty by a jury of attempted first
degree murder and possession of a firearm by certain persons. He was sentenced as a habitual
offender to eighty years’ imprisonment. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed. Bradshaw v.
State, CACR 04510 (Ark. App. Dec. 15, 2004).
Petitioner, who contends that he is indigent, now seeks a copy of the trial transcript lodged
1
on appeal in order to prove his innocence. There are no grounds for the request beyond the assertion
that his attorney failed to turn over the transcript from the direct appeal to petitioner.
It appears that petitioner erroneously presumes that his in forma pauperis status on direct
appeal obligates the state to provide him with a copy of the transcript of his trial. When a record on
direct appeal is prepared at public expense, it is prepared for the purpose of perfecting the appeal.
The record lodged on appeal is not the property of the appellant, and as such, petitioner has no
1
For clerical purposes, the motion has been filed under the docket number assigned to the
direct appeal of the judgment.
absolute right to a personal copy of it.
Furthermore, a petitioner is not entitled to a free copy of material on file with this court unless
he or she demonstrates some compelling need for certain documentary evidence to support an
allegation contained in a timely petition for postconviction relief. See Austin v. State, 287 Ark. 256,
697 S.W.2d 914 (1985) (per curiam). Indigency alone does not entitle a petitioner to free
photocopying. Washington v. State, 270 Ark. 840, 606 S.W.2d 365 (1980) (per curiam). Petitioner
here has cited no specific reason for requiring the requested material and has failed to demonstrate
that there is a postconviction remedy available to him.
It should be noted that when an appeal has been lodged in this court, the appeal transcript
remains permanently on file with the clerk. Persons may review a transcript in the clerk’s office, and
photocopy all or portions of it. An incarcerated person desiring a photocopy of a transcript on file
may write this court, remit the photocopying fee and request that the copy be mailed to the prison.
All persons, including prisoners, must bear the cost of photocopying. Moore v. State, 324 Ark. 453,
921 S.W.2d 606 (1996) (per curiam).
Motion denied.
2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.