Willie J. Cartwright v. State of Arkansas

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT  No.  CR 07­905  Opinion Delivered  WILLIE J. CARTWRIGHT  Appellant  v.  STATE OF ARKANSAS  Appellee  February 21, 2008  PRO SE MOTION TO FILE  SUBSTITUTED BRIEF [CIRCUIT  COURT OF GRANT COUNTY, CR  2004­119, HON. PHILLIP SHIRRON,  JUDGE]  MOTION GRANTED.  PER CURIAM  Now before us is appellant Willie J. Cartwright’s motion to file a substituted brief containing  a  supplemental  abstract  and  addendum.    Appellant  filed  this  motion  in  response  to  appellee’s  argument in its response brief that appellant’s abstract was deficient.  Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4­7(c)(3)(b), this court will routinely grant such motions filed  by an appellant and give the appellant thirty days within which to file a substituted brief containing  a supplemental abstract and addendum.  The appellee will then be afforded an opportunity to revise  or supplement its brief in response to the appellant’s substituted brief.  Appellant’s  motion  is  granted.  Appellant’s  substituted  brief  containing  a  supplemental  abstract and addendum is due thirty days from the date of this opinion.  Motion granted.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.