Walter A. McCullough v. Honorable Victor Hill, Circuit Judge
Annotate this CaseARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
No. CR 05-723
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
WALTER A. McCULLOUGH
Petitioner
v.
HON. VICTOR HILL, CIRCUIT
JUDGE
Respondent
Opinion Delivered September 22, 2005
PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS [CIRCUIT COURT OF CRAIGHEAD COUNTY, WESTERN DISTRICT, CR 2004-820]
PETITION MOOT
PER CURIAM
On April 27, 2005, judgment was entered reflecting that Walter A. McCullough had been found guilty by a jury of committing a terroristic act and sentenced to 480 months' imprisonment.
On May 12, 2005, McCullough filed in the trial court a pro se motion for new trial pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 33.1.
Now before us is a pro se petition for writ of mandamus filed by McCullough in which he contends that the trial court has not acted on his motion and asking that this court direct the court to make a ruling. The mandamus petition is moot inasmuch as Criminal Procedure Rule 33.3(c) provides in pertinent part that if the trial court neither grants nor denies a motion for new trial within thirty days, the motion is deemed denied as of the thirtieth day by operation of law.
Petition moot.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.