Warren Looney v. State of Arkansas

Annotate this Case
cr04-578

ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT

No. CR 04-578

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

WARREN LOONEY

Appellant

v.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

Appellee

Opinion Delivered June 23, 2005

PRO SE PETITION FOR REHEARING [APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF INDEPENDENCE COUNTY, NO. CR 1999-177-1, HONORABLE JOHN DAN KEMP, JUDGE]

PETITION FOR REHEARING DENIED

PER CURIAM

Appellant was tried before a jury and convicted of aggravated robbery. He was sentenced to 360 months' imprisonment and ordered to pay restitution of $1,200 to Tammy Mansfield, the woman he robbed. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed. Looney v. State, CA CR 01-1308 (Ark. App. Oct. 22, 2003). Appellant subsequently filed a timely petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37, which was denied without a hearing. Appellant appealed, and we affirmed. Looney v. State, CR 04-578 (Ark. May 26, 2005) (per curiam).

Appellant now seeks rehearing of our decision. Rule 2-3(g) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court provides that the petition for rehearing should be used to call attention to specific errors of law or fact which the opinion is thought to contain. As appellant fails to identify any error in the court's opinion, we decline to consider his petition for rehearing.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Imber, J., not participating.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.