Warren Looney v. State of Arkansas
Annotate this CaseARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
No. CR 04-578
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
WARREN LOONEY
Appellant
v.
STATE OF ARKANSAS
Appellee
Opinion Delivered June 23, 2005
PRO SE PETITION FOR REHEARING [APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF INDEPENDENCE COUNTY, NO. CR 1999-177-1, HONORABLE JOHN DAN KEMP, JUDGE]
PETITION FOR REHEARING DENIED
PER CURIAM
Appellant was tried before a jury and convicted of aggravated robbery. He was sentenced to 360 months' imprisonment and ordered to pay restitution of $1,200 to Tammy Mansfield, the woman he robbed. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed. Looney v. State, CA CR 01-1308 (Ark. App. Oct. 22, 2003). Appellant subsequently filed a timely petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37, which was denied without a hearing. Appellant appealed, and we affirmed. Looney v. State, CR 04-578 (Ark. May 26, 2005) (per curiam).
Appellant now seeks rehearing of our decision. Rule 2-3(g) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court provides that the petition for rehearing should be used to call attention to specific errors of law or fact which the opinion is thought to contain. As appellant fails to identify any error in the court's opinion, we decline to consider his petition for rehearing.
Petition for rehearing denied.
Imber, J., not participating.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.