Brunson Roberts v. State of Arkansas
Annotate this CaseARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
No. CR 04-754
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
October 14, 2004
BRUNSON ROBERTS
APPELLANT
v.
STATE OF ARKANSAS
APPELLEE
Opinion Delivered
PRO SE PETITION FOR REVIEW [CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, CR 2002-1866, HON. WILLARD PROCTOR, JUDGE]
PETITION DENIED
PER CURIAM
Brunson Roberts was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to fourteen years' imprisonment. The court of appeals affirmed. Roberts v. State, CACR 03-625 (Ark. App. June 30, 2004).
Now before us is Roberts's pro se petition for review in this court. Appellant Roberts was represented by counsel in the appeal to the court of appeals. He has not demonstrated that there is some good cause to permit him to enjoy representation by counsel and to also file pro se pleadings. It is well settled that having accepted representation by counsel, an appellant is not entitled to pursue his own motions for relief and also rely on counsel to represent him. See Monts v. Lessenberry, 305 Ark. 202, 806 S.W.2d 379 (1991). Accordingly, the pro se petition for review is denied.
Petition for review denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.