Larry Handy v. State of Arkansas
Annotate this Case
ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
December 9, 2004
LARRY HANDY
Appellant
v.
STATE OF ARKANSAS
Appellee
CR 04-725
PRO SE MOTION AND AMENDED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION FOR COPY OF RECORD TO PREPARE BRIEF [CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, NO. CR 99-3939, HON. JOHN LANGSTON, JUDGE]
MOTION AND AMENDED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED; MOTION FOR COPY OF RECORD TO PREPARE BRIEF MOOT
Per Curiam
We dismissed an appeal from a postconviction order in which the circuit court declined to grant relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37.1 to Larry Handy. Handy v. State, CR 04-725 (October 7, 2004) (per curiam). Appellant now asks that we reconsider.
We concluded in the decision dismissing the appeal that appellant had failed to demonstrate that he was not procedurally barred from proceeding under Rule 37.1. We find nothing in the motion for reconsideration that establishes that appellant was in fact entitled to postconviction relief in the trial court. Accordingly, there was no basis on which petitioner could have prevailed on appeal and no grounds for reconsideration of the motion.
Appellant also filed a motion for a copy of the record lodged on appeal to prepare the appellant's brief. As the appeal has been dismissed, the motion is moot.
Motion and amended motion for reconsideration denied; motion for copy of record to prepare brief moot.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.