Antonio L. Britt v. State of Arkansas
Annotate this CaseAntonio BRITT v. STATE of Arkansas CR 97-200 ___ S.W.2d ___ Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 14, 1997 Appeal & error -- motion to withdraw as counsel denied. -- Where the attorney for appellant filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, stating that it would be in the best interest of all concerned and that another attorney had expressed an interest in handling the case, the supreme court, noting that no motion to appoint substitute counsel had been filed on behalf of appellant, denied the motion. Motion to Withdraw as Counsel; denied. Ronald C. Wilson, for appellant. No response. Per Curiam. Ronald C. Wilson, attorney for appellant, Antonio Britt, has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, stating that it would be in the best interest of all concerned. The motion further states that another attorney, Don Forrest, has expressed an interest in handling the case. However, as of this date, no motion to appoint substitute counsel has been filed on behalf of appellant. The motion is, therefore, denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.