State of Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Vicki Rene Secrest
Annotate this Case(Download the WordPerfect format here.)
STATE of Arkansas OFFICE of CHILD SUPPORT
ENFORCEMENT v. Vicki Rene SECREST
98-245___ S.W.2d ___
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered July 2, 1998
1. Civil procedure -- motion to modify made more than ninety days
after order filed -- untimely motion properly denied. -- Where
the appellant filed a motion to modify the chancery order more
than ninety-four days after the entry of the original order,
appellant's motion was untimely, and the order denying the
motion was affirmed.
2. Civil procedure -- orders -- modification of. -- In accordance
with Ark. R. Civ. P. 60(b), an order may be modified within
ninety days of its having been filed with the clerk; absent
circumstances stated in Rule 60(c), which were inapplicable
here, a court loses jurisdiction to modify its order after the
passage of ninety days.
Appeal from Pope Chancery Court; Richard E. Gardner,
Chancellor; affirmed.
Kennedy, Phillips & Douthit, by: John C. Riedel, for
appellant.
William F. Smith, for appellee.
David Newbern, Justice.
Appellee Vicki Rene Secrest was awarded a divorce in the
Washington County Chancery Court and child support of $74.00 per
month to be paid by her ex-husband, Hal Secrest. Venue was changed
to Pope County where the Chancellor entered an order on June 9,
1997, finding Mr. Secrest delinquent in child-support payments in
the amount of $998.00. Mr. Secrest was ordered to pay $81.40
thereafter. Earlier payments had been made through the Office of
Child Support Enforcement clearinghouse. At Ms. Secrest's request,
after hearing her complaint that she had difficulty obtaining
earlier payments made through the clearinghouse, the Chancellor
ordered that the payments be made to the registry of the court.
On September 11, 1997, which was ninety-four days after the entry
of the June 9, 1997 order, OCSE moved to intervene, asserting that
Ms. Secrest had assigned her rights to it. The following month,
OCSE moved to modify the order to require that the payments be made
though the clearinghouse. The motion was denied. OCSE appeals,
contending that in accordance with Ark. Code Ann. § 9-14-803(b)(1)(A) (Supp. 1997), all child-support payments must be made
through the clearing house. We accepted the case upon
certification by the Court of Appeals because we had not previously
interpreted the statute, but we must affirm the order because the
motion to modify it was untimely and the Chancellor thus lacked
jurisdiction to do so.
In accordance with Ark. R. Civ. P. 60(b), an order may be
modified within ninety days of its having been filed with the
clerk. Absent circumstances stated in Rule 60(c), which do not
apply in this case, a court loses jurisdiction to modify its order
after the passage of ninety days. Slaton v. Slaton, 330 Ark. 287,
956 S.W.2d 150 (1997); Griggs v. Cook, 315 Ark. 74, 864 S.W.2d 832
(1993).
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.