Tanner v. State
Annotate this CaseLindell TANNER v. STATE of Arkansas CR 96-965 ___ S.W.2d ___ Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 9, 1996 Appeal & error -- motion for rule on clerk -- good cause for granting. -- An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk. Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted. Richard R. West, for appellant. No response. Per Curiam. Appellant, Lindell Tanner, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Richard R. West, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.