Tanner v. State

Annotate this Case
Lindell TANNER v. STATE of Arkansas

CR 96-965                                          ___ S.W.2d ___

                    Supreme Court of Arkansas
               Opinion delivered September 9, 1996


Appeal & error -- motion for rule on clerk -- good cause for 
     granting. -- An admission by an attorney for a criminal
     defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake
     on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the
     clerk.


     Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.
     Richard R. West, for appellant.
     No response.

     Per Curiam.
     Appellant, Lindell Tanner, by his attorney, has filed for a
rule on the clerk.  His attorney, Richard R. West, admits that the
failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his
part.
     We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney
for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion.  See
our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated
Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.  A copy of this opinion
will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.