Woodruff v. State
Annotate this CaseDarren WOODRUFF v. STATE of Arkansas CR 96-90 ___ S.W.2d ___ Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 12, 1996 Appeal & error -- motion for rule on clerk treated as motion for belated appeal -- good cause for granting. -- Where the Clerk refused to docket the record because the notice of appeal was late, the supreme court treated the motion for rule on the clerk as a motion for belated appeal; failure of counsel to perfect an appeal for a defendant who wishes to appeal constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel, and good cause for granting a belated appeal pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 36.9(e); the motion was granted. Motion for Belated Appeal; granted. Maxie G. Kizer, for appellant. No response. Per Curiam.2/12/96 *ADVREP18* CR96-90 DARREN WOODRUFF Appellant v. STATE OF ARKANSAS Motion for Belated Appeal Appellee Motion granted Per Curiam. Appellant, Darren Woodruff, by his attorney, Maxie G. Kizer, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The Clerk refused to docket the record concerning Mr. Woodruff's conviction because it revealed that the notice of appeal was late. We treat the motion for rule on the clerk as a motion for belated appeal in this circumstance. Failure of counsel to perfect an appeal for a defendant who wishes to appeal constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel, and good cause for granting a belated appeal pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 36.9(e). A copy of this opinion will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.