Barnes v. State
Annotate this CaseGuy C. BARNES v. STATE of Arkansas CR 96-114 ___ S.W.2d ___ Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 10, 1996 Appeal & error -- postconviction case -- no provision in rules for reconsideration. -- There is no provision in the rules of criminal procedure for a motion for reconsideration in a postconviction case. Pro Se Motion Motion for Reconsideration of Motion for Belated Appeal of Postconviction Order (Sebastian Circuit Court, Fort Smith District, No. CR 94-417, CR 94-418, CR 94-419, & CR 94-420); Don Langston, Judge; motion denied. Appellant, pro se. No response. Per Curiam.June 10, 1996 *ADVREP*SC6* GUY C. BARNES Petitioner v. STATE OF ARKANSAS Respondent CR 96-114 PRO SE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL OF POSTCONVICTION ORDER (CIRCUIT COURT OF SEBASTIAN COUNTY, FORT SMITH DISTRICT, NO. CR 94-417, CR 94-418, CR 94-419 & CR 94- 420), HON. DON LANGSTON, JUDGE MOTION DENIED Per Curiam. On March 21, 1995, judgment was entered reflecting that Guy C. Barnes had pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court of Sebastian County to four counts of delivery of a controlled substance and had been sentenced to an aggregate sentence of twenty-two years imprisonment. Mr. Barnes filed in Sebastian County a pro se petition pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37 seeking to vacate the judgment. An order was entered denying the petition from which an appeal was not taken. Petitioner Barnes sought permission from this court to proceed with a belated appeal. The motion was denied. Barnes v. State, CR 96-114 (March 26, 1996). Petitioner has filed the motion for reconsideration which is now before us. The motion is denied. There is no provision in the rules of procedure for a motion for reconsideration in a postconviction case. In Re Motions for Reconsideration in Postconviction Matters, 319 Ark. Appx. 826 (1994). Motion denied. Dudley, J., not participating.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.