Oregon Tax Court, Magistrate Division Decisions 2022

Swanek v. Lane County Assessor
Date: December 28, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210089N
Lowery v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: December 20, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210295R
Hansen v. Morrow County Assessor
Date: December 19, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 220032G
Eichorn v. Yamhill County Assessor
Date: December 5, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210323R
Lessey v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: November 29, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210265G
Nichols v. Curry County Assessor
Date: November 22, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 220152R
Lee v. Douglas County Tax Collector
Date: November 22, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 220384R
Cerney v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: November 18, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 220160N
Russell Fellows Properties, LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor
Date: November 15, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 220307N
Eichorn v. Yamhill County Assessor
Date: September 30, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210323R
Williams v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: September 29, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210208G
Curtis v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: September 27, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210413N
Sherman v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: September 8, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210365G
Gould v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: August 31, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210019R
Woodland v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: August 30, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 220158R
Avakian v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: August 29, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210326G
House v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: August 26, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210402R
4310 Building LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor
Date: August 23, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 220154N
NBCUniversal, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: August 17, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 170037R
Gua v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: August 17, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210392N
Hoxie v. Clatsop County Assessor
Date: August 12, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210218N
King v. Columbia County Assessor
Date: June 30, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210327N
Bates v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: May 31, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210385G
Cleary v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: May 23, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210398N
Lindquist Holdings LLC v. Yamhill County Assessor
Date: May 9, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210226G
Edgeconnex, Inc. v. Washington County Assessor
Date: May 4, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 200410N
McCool v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: April 25, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210259G
McGrath's Public Fish House v. Marion County Assessor
Date: April 20, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 200092R
Helms Deep, LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor
Date: April 12, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 200292N
Godard v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: April 7, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210354N
Vesta Corp. v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: March 28, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 200019G
Woodland v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: March 23, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210355R
Zmation, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: March 17, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210293N
Harder v. Deschutes County Assessor
Date: March 10, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 200126G
Shevtsov v. Clackamas County Assesor
Date: March 10, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210076N
Dunne-Bjornsen v. Douglas County Assessor
Date: February 15, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210097N
Lowe's HIW, Inc. v. Marion County Assessor
Date: February 3, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210115R
White Oak River Inc. v. Washington County Assessor
Date: February 2, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210002G
Harder v. Deschutes County Assessor
Date: January 31, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 200126G
Mack v. Dept. of Rev.
Date: January 24, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 200339G
Hilvas Trust & Net Charge Corp. v. Marion County Assessor
Date: January 13, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210028R
Shevtsov v. Multnomah County Assessor
Date: January 12, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210078N
Shevtsov v. Multnomah County Assessor
Date: January 12, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210079N
Kusuma v. Washington County Assessor
Date: January 11, 2022
Docket Number: TC-MD 210022R
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites. These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.