2020 Georgia Code
Title 5 - Appeal and Error
Chapter 6 - Certiorari and Appeals to Appellate Courts Generally
Article 2 - Appellate Practice


ARTICLE 2 APPELLATE PRACTICE

Law reviews.

- For article suggesting change in Georgia appellate procedure prior to the adoption of the Appellate Practice Act, see 15 Ga. B.J. 322 (1953). For article advocating reform of appellate procedure prior to the adoption of the Appellate Practice Act, see 18 Ga. B.J. 415 (1956). For article outlining proposed revisions of appellate procedure rules with comments, prior to the adoption of the Appellate Practice Act, see 19 Ga. B.J. 145 (1956). For article, "A Discussion of the 1957 Amendments to Rules of Practice and Procedure in Georgia," see 19 Ga. B.J. 395 (1957). For article discussing results of legislative changes in appellate procedure, prior to the enactment of the Appellate Practice Act, see 20 Ga. B.J. 38 (1957). For article, "The Appellate Procedure Act of 1965" (this article), see 1 Ga. St. B.J. 451 (1965). For article, "1966 Amendments to the Appellate Procedure Act of 1965" (this article), see 2 Ga. St. B.J. 433 (1966). For article, "The 1967 Amendments to the Georgia Civil Practice Act and the Appellate Procedure Act" (this article), see 3 Ga. St. B.J. 383 (1967). For article discussing problems in Georgia appellate procedure after the adoption of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (this article), see 5 Ga. St. B.J. 231 (1968). For article discussing developments in Georgia appellate practice and procedure in 1976 to 1977 (this article), see 29 Mercer L. Rev. 21 (1977). For annual survey of appellate practice and procedure, see 36 Mercer L. Rev. 79 (1984). For annual survey on administrative law, see 69 Mercer L. Rev. 15 (2017).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Legislative intent was to provide a uniform post-trial procedure in all courts of this state from which a writ of error (see O.C.G.A. ยง 5-6-50) would lie to Supreme Court or Court of Appeals at time of passage. White Oak Acres, Inc. v. Campbell, 113 Ga. App. 833, 149 S.E.2d 870 (1966); Blackburn v. Hall, 115 Ga. App. 235, 154 S.E.2d 392 (1967).

Clear intent is to simplify procedures and avoid dismissal on appeal on account of technical deficiencies. Continental Cas. Co. v. Stephenson, 114 Ga. App. 555, 152 S.E.2d 5 (1966).

Forms of appeals and enumerations of error are governed by practically unlimited looseness authorized by this article. Thomas v. Scott, 221 Ga. 875, 148 S.E.2d 300 (1966) (see O.C.G.A. Art. 2, Ch. 6, T. 5).

Compliance is prerequisite to appellate jurisdiction.

- Appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review judgment sought to be appealed when the appellant fails to follow procedure which confers jurisdiction upon the appellate court. Associated Distribs., Inc. v. Willard, 242 Ga. 247, 248 S.E.2d 645 (1978).

Court's general powers cannot be used to correct noncompliance.

- While a court may have the general power to enter certain types of orders, such as those allowing late filing of papers or those entered or effective nunc pro tunc, that power cannot be used to correct failure to comply with the mandatory requirements of this article. Cranman Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Wilson Marine Sales & Serv., Inc., 147 Ga. App. 590, 249 S.E.2d 631 (1978) (see O.C.G.A. Art. 2, Ch. 6, T. 5).

Cited in Crosby v. Crosby, 247 Ga. 792, 279 S.E.2d 712 (1981); Duke v. State, 306 Ga. 171, 829 S.E.2d 348 (2019).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

- Power of legislature to require appellate court to review evidence, 19 A.L.R. 744; 24 A.L.R. 1267; 33 A.L.R. 10.

Sufficiency of general objection or exception to evidence admitted without qualification, which was competent against one or more parties, but not all, 106 A.L.R. 467.

Interlocutory ruling or order of one judge as binding on another in same case, 132 A.L.R. 14.

Judgment favorable to convicted criminal defendant in subsequent civil action arising out of same offense as ground for reversal of conviction, 96 A.L.R.3d 1174.

Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. Georgia may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.