Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce v. Tony Evers
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
2023 WI 5 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN NOTICE This order is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 2020AP2081-AC & 2020AP2109-AC Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, Muskego Area Chamber of Commerce and New Berlin Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Bureau, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Petitioners, v. Tony Evers, in his official capacity as Governor of Wisconsin, Karen Timberlake, in her official capacity as Interim Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Health Services and Joel Brennan, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Administration, FILED JAN 23, 2023 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Supreme Court Madison, WI Defendants, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Intervenor-Appellant. The Court entered the following order on this date: ¶1 Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce filed a motion for reconsideration of our decision in Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce v. Evers, 2022 WI 38, 401 Wis. 2d 699, 974 N.W.2d 753. The State Defendants and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel opposed WMC's motion. costs. We deny the motion for reconsideration without No. ¶2 2020AP2081-AC & 2020AP2109-AC We nevertheless file this memorandum on the motion to address one of WMC's arguments, namely that this Court should clarify that footnote 9 of the court of appeals' decision has no precedential value. See Wis. Mfrs. & Commerce v. Evers, 2021 WI App 35, ¶24 n.9, 398 Wis. 2d 164, 960 N.W.2d 442; see also Wis. Sup. Ct. IOP III.J ("A motion for reconsideration may result in the court's issuing a corrective or explanatory memorandum to its opinion without changing the original mandate."). We conclude that, in this case, footnote 9 of the court of appeals' decision has no precedential value. We leave for another day the issue of whether the rule from Blum v. 1st Auto & Cas. Ins. Co., 2010 WI 78, ¶46, 326 Wis. 2d 729, 786 N.W.2d 78, that "[u]nless this court explicitly states otherwise, a court of appeals opinion overruled by this court no longer retains any precedential value," should be extended to Appraisals, cover LLC the v. present Musson situation. Bros., 2013 WI See 79, also ¶71 Showers n.4, 350 Wis. 2d 509, 835 N.W.2d 226 (Crooks, J., concurring). ¶3 IT IS ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied without costs. 2 No. 3 2020AP2081-AC & 2020AP2109-AC
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
