Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ann Cahill Hammer
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-2957-D Complete Title of Case: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Ann Cahill, Attorney at Law. DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST CAHILL Opinion Filed: Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument: Source of APPEAL COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE: JUSTICES: Concurred: Dissented: Not Participating: ATTORNEYS: June 24, 1998 No. 97-2957-D NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 97-2957-D STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT FILED In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings JUN 24, 1998 Against ANN CAHILL, Attorney at Law. Marilyn L. Graves Clerk of Supreme Court Madison, WI ATTORNEY disciplinary proceeding. Attorney s license suspended; conditions imposed. ¶1 PER referee that Wisconsin be CURIAM the We license suspended review the of Cahill for Ann six recommendation months to and practice that of law the in conditions directed to her rehabilitation from alcoholism be imposed on that license for two years following reinstatement as discipline for her misconduct. That misconduct led to numerous criminal violations, for which she has served time in jail and has been placed on probation and fined. We determine that the recommended discipline is appropriate for the misconduct established in this proceeding. ¶2 Attorney Cahill was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1992 and began practicing in 1996. She currently practices in Oshkosh. She has not been the subject of a prior disciplinary proceeding. Based on the stipulation of the parties and Attorney Cahill s admissions in her answer to the complaint 1 No. 97-2957-D of the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (Board), the referee, Attorney John E. Shannon, Jr., made findings of fact and conclusions of law as follows. ¶3 During the 16-month period from August, 1995 to December, 1996, Attorney Cahill engaged in conduct that led to the following misdemeanor convictions: two counts of fraud of a hotel innkeeper, for which she was sentenced to one year s probation and ordered to pay $1300 restitution; second and third offenses of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, for which she was fined, her driving privileges were revoked, and she was sentenced to 20 days and 60 days in jail, respectively; two counts of issuing worthless checks, for which she was placed on 36 months probation and ordered to pay $950 restitution; one count of issuing worthless check, for which she was placed on one year s probation and ordered to pay $882.02 restitution; one count of disorderly conduct, which involved her violent reaction to alcohol. Attorney Cahill has made all restitution as ordered, and her probation ended September 22, 1997. ¶4 of an The referee concluded that by her convictions of fraud innkeeper, disorderly conduct, OWI, issuance Attorney of Cahill worthless has checks, committed acts and that reflect adversely on her honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b). He also concluded that her issuance of worthless checks and fraud of an innkeeper convictions constituted conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(c). 2 No. ¶5 from 97-2957-D The referee found further that Attorney Cahill suffers alcoholism and that her OWI and disorderly conduct convictions were causally related to it. She has been abstaining from alcohol since disciplinary July hearing, 5, she 1997, was and at pursuing the time the for treatment of her alcoholism. The referee concluded that Attorney Cahill has a medical incapacity, as defined in SCR 22.01(12),1 and that her right to practice law should be made subject to the conditions directed to her continued treatment for alcoholism to which she and the Board had stipulated. ¶6 The referee also license to practice law recommended be that suspended Attorney for six Cahill s months as discipline for the misconduct for which her alcoholism was not considered a mitigating factor, namely, three convictions for issuing worthless dismissed by sentencing on checks and the prosecutor two worthless a theft but check read offense in charges. that for In had purposes addition, been of the referee recommended that Attorney Cahill be required to pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶7 We adopt the referee s findings of fact and conclusions of law and determine that the recommended six-month 1 SCR 22.01(12) provides: (12) Medical Incapacity means the inability of an attorney to practice law because of a physical, mental, emotional, social or behavioral condition that is recognized by experts in medicine or psychology as a principal factor which substantially prevents the attorney from performing his or her profession to acceptable professional standards. 3 No. license suspension and the imposition of the 97-2957-D stipulated conditions related to her alcoholism constitute the appropriate disciplinary referee, response none of to the her misconduct. offenses of As which noted she was by the convicted involved a client of Attorney Cahill or her conduct as a lawyer. ¶8 practice IT IS ORDERED that law in Wisconsin the is license suspended of for Ann a Cahill period of to six months, commencing August 10, 1998. ¶9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that for a period of two years following reinstatement of her license, Attorney Cahill shall comply with the conditions specified in the stipulation on file in this proceeding. ¶10 of this IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 60 days of the date order, Professional provided Ann Cahill that if the costs to the Responsibility pay costs of not paid are the Board of this Attorneys proceeding, within the time specified and absent a showing to this court of her inability to pay the costs within that time, the license of Ann Cahill to practice law in Wisconsin shall remain suspended until further order of the court. ¶11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ann Cahill comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license to practice law in Wisconsin 4 has been suspended. 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
