State v. Dow (concurring)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
State v. Dow, No. 81243-8 Concurrence by J.M. Johnson, J. No. 81243-8 J.M. JOHNSON, J. (concurring) I concur in the majority s judgment only because no shred of evidence besides the defendant s confession corroborates the abhorrent crime of which he has been accused. I write separately, however, to emphasize the heightened need for substantiating evidence in sexual assault cases involving very young victims who are likely to be found incompetent to testify. Caption., xxxxx-x AUTHOR: Justice James M. Johnson WE CONCUR: 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
