Picich v. DEPT. OF LABOR & IND.

Annotate this Case

59 Wn.2d 467 (1962)

368 P.2d 176

JOSEPH PICICH, Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES et al., Appellants.[*]

No. 35808.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

January 18, 1962.

The Attorney General and Robert O. Wells, Jr., Assistant, Holman, Mickelwait, Marion, Black & Perkins, and Fred S. Merritt, for appellants.

F.W. Loomis and Walthew, Warner & Keefe, for respondent.

FOSTER, J.

[1] The Department of Labor and Industries and Rayonier, Inc., appeal from a judgment increasing an award for permanent partial disability. After the last closing of the claim, the department reopened it and, on November 13, 1957, made an additional permanent partial disability award, from which order the respondent appealed to the superior court. By reopening the claim and making the increased award, the department itself decided that respondent's condition had changed in the interval. The only issue upon the appeal to the superior court was the extent of the disability resulting from the injury. Upon conflicting evidence, the court increased the award.

Appellants frankly concede that the judgment must be *468 affirmed unless Collins v. Department of Labor & Industries, 50 Wn. (2d) 194, 310 P. (2d) 232, is overruled. This we decline to do and adhere to that decision in which we said:

"When the supervisor of industrial insurance reopened respondent's claim and made an increased award from which the respondent appealed, the only issue was the extent of the disability ..." (Italics ours.)

The judgment is affirmed.

FINLEY, C.J., HILL, WEAVER, and ROSELLINI, JJ., concur.

April 4, 1962. Petition for rehearing denied.

NOTES

[*] Reported in 368 P. (2d) 176.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.