Commonwealth v. Baker

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Present: All the Justices COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA v. Record No. 982102 PER CURIAM June 11, 1999 JERAMIE MICHAEL BAKER FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA In this appeal, the Court reviews a judgment of the Court of Appeals declaring the transfer of jurisdiction from a juvenile and domestic relations district court to a circuit court ineffectual and the subsequent convictions void. Baker v. Commonwealth, 28 Va. App. 306, 504 S.E.2d 394 (1998). Central to the decision below was the interpretation of Code § 16.1-263(A), which provides, in part, that after a juvenile petition is filed, the court shall direct summonses "to the parents" of the juvenile. Here, even though the juvenile's mother received notice, the juvenile's biological father was not notified, there was no attempt to give him notice, and the circuit court made no certification on the record that the identity of the father was not reasonably ascertainable. Parenthetically, we note the statute has been amended effective July 1, 1999 to provide for notice to "at least one parent." Acts 1999, ch. 952. For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the court's judgment. Furthermore, we decline the Attorney General's request that we apply this judgment prospectively only; retrospective application is mandated by Gogley v. Peyton, 208 Va. 679, 160 S.E.2d 746 (1968). Affirmed. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.