State v. Ashcraft
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of six counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, two counts of unlawful possession of a dangerous weapon, possession of drug paraphernalia, driving on a suspended license, possession of an open container of alcohol in a vehicle, and failure to signal. Defendant appealed his convictions of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, possession of drug paraphernalia, and possession of a dangerous weapon. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) there was sufficient evidence to establish Defendant’s possession of the contraband; and (2) the prosecutor did not engage in impermissible conduct during trial.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.