Gregory v. Shurtleff
Annotate this CaseAppellants were a group of current and former legislators, other elected and unelected government officials, and citizens. Appellants filed suit against the State's attorney general, treasurer, and the executive director of the Department of Human Resources (collectively, Appellees), seeking a declaration that Senate Bill 2, a bill related to education, was unconstitutional and an injunction against its implementation. Appellants claimed the Bill was unconstitutional in four respects. The first two claims fell under Utah Const. art. VI, 22, and the second two claims fell under Utah Const. art. X, 3. The district court dismissed the Article VI claims for failure to state a claim, and later granted Appellees' motion for summary judgment on the Article X claims. At issue on appeal was whether Appellants had standing to bring these claims in the first place. The Supreme Court held (1) Appellants had public-interest standing to bring the Article VI claims, but the district court properly dismissed the claims under Utah R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); and (2) Appellants did not have standing to bring the Article X claims, and therefore, summary judgment on these claims, rather than dismissal, was improper.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.