Florence v. Colbert

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ----ooOoo---Casey Florence, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Chad Colbert, Defendant and Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM DECISION (Not For Official Publication) Case No. 20090756-CA F I L E D (December 17, 2009) 2009 UT App 378 ----Third District, Salt Lake Department, 070904712 The Honorable Michele M. Christiansen Attorneys: Lawrence R. Peterson, Bradley G. Nykamp, Salt Lake City, for Appellant ----- Before Judges Greenwood, Davis, and Thorne. PER CURIAM: Casey Florence appeals the trial court's ruling dismissing his claim. This matter is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on a lack of jurisdiction due to the absence of a final order. Neither party responded to the motion. The trial court's ruling notified the parties of its decision in the case but did not expressly state that no other order was required. Accordingly, under rule 7(f) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, the prevailing party was obligated to submit a proposed order formalizing the decision. See Utah R. Civ. P. 7(f)(2). If the prevailing party fails to fulfill its duty, the nonprevailing party may submit an order to pursue finality. See Code v. Department of Health, 2007 UT 43, ¶ 7, 162 P.3d 1097. Absent specific direction by the court that no other order is necessary, the ruling itself is not a final order and one of the parties must submit an order for the purposes of finality. See id. ¶ 6 ("A court should include this explicit direction whenever it intends a document . . . to constitute its final action. Otherwise, rule 7(f)(2) requires the preparation and filing of an order to trigger finality for purposes of appeal."). Neither party submitted an order memorializing the trial court's decision. Accordingly, there is no final order for purposes of appeal. Where an appeal is improperly taken, this court lacks jurisdiction and must dismiss it. See Bradbury v. Valencia, 2000 UT 50, ¶ 8, 5 P.3d 649. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the filing of a timely notice of appeal from a final order. ______________________________ Pamela T. Greenwood, Presiding Judge ______________________________ James Z. Davis, Judge ______________________________ William A. Thorne Jr., Judge 20090756-CA 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.