American Fork City v. Durrant

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ----ooOoo---American Fork City, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Dorothy Durrant, Defendant and Appellant. MEMORANDUM DECISION (Not For Official Publication) Case No. 20090587-CA F I L E D (September 17, 2009) 2009 UT App 263 ----Fourth District, American Fork Department, 095102744 The Honorable Howard H. Maetani Attorneys: Dorothy Durrant, Lehi, Appellant Pro Se ----- Before Judges Bench, Orme, and McHugh. PER CURIAM: Dorothy Durrant appeals her speeding conviction. This is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on the lack of a substantial question for review. Durrant asserts that the ticketing officer gave false testimony and that his entire testimony should have been disregarded. Essentially, she challenges the officer's credibility. It is the fact finder's role to determine the credibility of witnesses. See State v. Workman, 852 P.2d 981, 984 (Utah 1993). Generally, "a reviewing court may not reassess credibility." Id. Because matters of credibility are beyond the reach of this court and there are no other issues raised, there is no substantial question for review meriting further consideration by this court. Affirmed. ______________________________ Russell W. Bench, Judge ______________________________ Gregory K. Orme, Judge ______________________________ Carolyn B. McHugh, Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.