State v. Staggs

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ----ooOoo---State of Utah, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Daniel Staggs, Defendant and Appellant. MEMORANDUM DECISION (Not For Official Publication) Case No. 20070927-CA F I L E D (September 18, 2008) 2008 UT App 340 ----Fifth District, Cedar City Department, 071500230 The Honorable John J. Walton Attorneys: J. Bryan Jackson, Cedar City, for Appellant ----- Before Judges Billings, Davis, and McHugh. PER CURIAM: Daniel Staggs appeals his conviction on a charge of vehicle burglary. Staggs's counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 783 (1967), and State v. Clayton, 639 P.2d 168 (Utah 1981). The brief "objectively demonstrate[s] that the issues raised are frivolous." State v. Flores, 855 P.2d 258, 260 (Utah Ct. App. 1993) (per curiam). Based upon our independent examination of the record, we determine that the appeal is, indeed, wholly frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm Staggs's conviction and sentence and grant counsel's motion to withdraw. ______________________________ Judith M. Billings, Judge ______________________________ James Z. Davis, Judge ______________________________ Carolyn B. McHugh, Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.