State v. Deboer
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ----ooOoo---State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Jared Bennett Deboer, Defendant and Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM DECISION (Not For Official Publication) Case No. 20060780-CA F I L E D () 2007 UT App XXX ----Fifth District, Cedar City Department, 051500484 The Honorable A. Lynn Payne Attorneys: J. Bryan Jackson, Cedar City, for Appellant Mark L. Shurtleff and J. Frederic Voros Jr., Salt Lake City, for Appellee ----- Before Judges Greenwood, Billings, and Davis. PER CURIAM: Jared Bennett Deboer appeals from his judgment, sentence, and commitment. Appellant's counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Clayton, 639 P.2d 168 (Utah 1981). The brief "objectively demonstrate[s] that the issues raised are frivolous." State v. Flores, 855 P.2d 258, 260 (Utah Ct. App. 1993) (per curiam). Counsel also certifies that he reviewed and briefed the grounds for appeal that Appellant requested be raised. See State v. Wells, 2000 UT App 304,ΒΆ10, 13 P.3d 1056 (per curiam) (stating counsel must determine and brief any issues appellant seeks to raise prior to filing Anders brief with the court and disapproving simultaneous filing and service on appellant). Appellant has neither responded nor objected to the Anders brief filed by counsel. Based upon our independent examination of the record, we determine that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction. ______________________________ Pamela T. Greenwood, Associate Presiding Judge ______________________________ Judith M. Billings, Judge ______________________________ James Z. Davis, Judge 20060780-CA 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
