Orem City v. Gedo
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ----ooOoo---Orem City, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Miguel David Gedo, Defendant and Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM DECISION (Not For Official Publication) Case No. 20060155-CA F I L E D (June 15, 2006) 2006 UT App 249 ----Fourth District, Orem Department, 055212625 The Honorable John C. Backlund Attorneys: Miguel David Gedo, Orem, Appellant Pro Se Robert J. Church, Orem, for Appellee ----- Before Judges Greenwood, Davis, and Thorne. PER CURIAM: Miguel David Gedo appeals his convictions in a traffic case of no child restraint device and improper turning or changing lanes, both infractions. This case is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition on the basis that the grounds for appeal are so insubstantial that they do not merit further proceedings or consideration by the appellate court. Gedo did not file a response to the sua sponte motion; accordingly, he has not demonstrated that the appeal presents any substantial ground for appeal. See Utah R. App. P. 10. A review of the docketing statement and the district court record demonstrates that Gedo has raised no meritorious challenge to his conviction or the sentence imposed by the district court. We affirm the judgment and sentence. ______________________________ Pamela T. Greenwood, Associate Presiding Judge ______________________________ James Z. Davis, Judge ______________________________ William A. Thorne Jr., Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
