Rice v. Dept. of Corrections
Annotate this Case----ooOoo----
Robert Rice,
Petitioner and Appellant,
v.
Department of Corrections,
Respondent and Appellee.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)
Case No. 20020743-CA
F I L E D
October 24, 2002
2002 UT App 353
-----
Third District, Salt Lake
Department
The Honorable Timothy R.
Hanson
Attorneys:
Robert Rice, Draper, Petitioner
Pro Se
Mark L. Shurtleff and Natalie
A. Wintch, Salt Lake City, for Respondent
-----
Before Judges Jackson, Billings, and Thorne.
PER CURIAM:
Petitioner filed for extraordinary relief under rule 65B(b) and (d) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. He claims that the prison violated a M.A.P. interview and participation agreement he made with the prison. This court issued a notice of consideration for summary disposition on the basis that the issue presented was so insubstantial as not to merit further consideration. See Utah R. App. P. 10. However, review of the trial court record indicates that no final appealable order has been issued.
The trial court determined
the petition was not frivolous on its face and required the State to respond.
The State filed a response and a motion to dismiss, which the trial court
deemed to be a motion for summary judgment. The trial court then granted
the motion for summary judgment in an unsigned minute entry and directed
the State to prepare the "appropriate documents." The record does not show
that such documents were prepared or signed. Accordingly, there is no final
appealable order and this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal.
See Utah R. App. P. 3(a); VarianEimac v. Lamoreaux, 767 P.2d 569, 570 (Utah Ct. App. 1989) ("When a matter is outside the court's jurisdiction
it retains only the authority to dismiss the action."). This appeal is
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice
to filing of an appeal upon issuance of a final appealable order.
______________________________
Norman H. Jackson,
Presiding Judge
______________________________
Judith M. Billings,
Associate Presiding Judge
______________________________
William A. Thorne Jr., Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.