Dawson v. Sweat
Annotate this Case----ooOoo----
Maude "Marie" Dawson
fka M. Marie Sweat,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Maxene Sweat aka Maxene
Jorgensen,
Jeanne Raquel Sweat, Lindsay
Gappmayer
fka Lindsay R. Sweat, and
Robert Gappmayer,
Defendants and Appellee.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)
Case No. 20010641-CA
F I L E D
May 16, 2002
2002 UT App 169
-----
Fourth District, Heber City Department
The Honorable Fred D. Howard
Attorneys:
D. Bruce Oliver, Salt Lake
City, for Appellant
Charles M. Bennett and Kristy
L. Bertelsen, Salt Lake City, for Appellee
-----
Before Judges Jackson, Bench, and Orme.
PER CURIAM:
This matter is before the
court on its sua sponte motion for consideration of summary dismissal for
lack of jurisdiction because Appellant Dawson does not appeal from a final
order. See Utah R. App. P. 10(e). The complaint alleged three causes
of action:
eviction, quiet
title, and slander of title. The trial court granted summary judgment in
favor of Appellee Jorgensen with respect to the action to quiet title.
The other matters remain pending before the trial court.
Because the trial court's order
is not a final appealable order and a proper petition for permission to
appeal an interlocutory order was not filed, this court lacks jurisdiction
over the appeal. See Utah R. App. P. 5. When this court lacks jurisdiction,
the appeal must be dismissed. See Serrato v. Utah Transit Auth.,
2000 UT App 299,¶7, 13 P.3d 616; Varian-Eimac v. Lamoreaux,
767 P.2d 569, 570 (Utah Ct. App. 1989). The dismissal is without prejudice
to filing an appeal from a final appealable order or an order duly certified
pursuant to Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Because of this court's
dismissal of the appeal, the court need not consider Dawson's motion for
stay and remand.
______________________________
Norman H. Jackson,
Presiding Judge
______________________________
Russell W. Bench, Judge
______________________________
Gregory K. Orme, Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.