Blue v. Workforce Appeals Board

Annotate this Case
Blue v. DWS IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

----ooOoo----

Linda Blue,
Petitioner,

v.

Workforce Appeals Board,
Department of Workforce Services,
Respondent.

MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)

Case No. 20020009-CA

F I L E D
May 23, 2002 2002 UT App 179 -----

Original Proceeding in this Court

Attorneys:
Linda Blue, Fruitland, Petitioner Pro Se
Lorin Blauer, Salt Lake City, for Respondent -----

Before Judges Bench, Davis, and Thorne.

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition to affirm the order below "on the basis that the grounds for review are so insubstantial as not to merit further consideration by the appellate court." Utah R. App. P. 10(a)(2).

Petitioner argues that she mistakenly failed to report her earnings when she transitioned to full-time employment. However, Petitioner was very familiar with the process of filing weekly claims and had, in the past, correctly reported her work and earnings to the Department of Workforce Services. Furthermore, Petitioner fails to demonstrate how the Appeals Board and Administrative Law Judge erred in their determinations.

Accordingly, we grant the sua sponte motion for summary disposition and affirm the order and judgment of the Workforce Appeals Board.
 
 

______________________________
Russell W. Bench, Judge
 
 

______________________________
James Z. Davis, Judge
 
 

______________________________
William A. Thorne Jr., Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.