Chieco v. DWSAnnotate this Case
IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS
Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals Board,
(Not For Official Publication)
Case No. 20010489-CA
F I L E D
(November 23, 2001)
2001 UT App 358
Original Proceeding in this Court
Attorneys: Michael L. Chieco, Sandy, Petitioner Pro Se
Lorin Blauer, Salt Lake City, for Respondent
Before Judges Greenwood, Jackson, and Davis.
This matter is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition to affirm the order below "on the basis that the grounds for review are so insubstantial as not to merit further consideration by the appellate court." Utah R. App. P. 10(a)(2).
Petitioner has not addressed the insubstantial grounds for review referred to in the motion. Instead, petitioner argues for an opportunity to participate in a hearing regarding the assessment of $618.00 for a penalty and overpayment of unemployment benefits. However, even though petitioner failed to appear for his first hearing, he did participate in a subsequent rescheduled hearing. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that this appeal presents any issue meriting further proceedings or consideration by this court. See Utah R. App. P. 10(a)(2).
Accordingly, we grant the sua sponte motion for summary
disposition and affirm the order and judgment of the Workforce Appeals Board.
Pamela T. Greenwood, Presiding Judge
Norman H. Jackson, Associate Presiding Judge
James Z. Davis, Judge