NICHOLSON, MALLORY VERNON Appeal from 195th District Court of Dallas County (other per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-92,799-1, WR-92,799-02, WR-92,799-03 EX PARTE MALLORY VERNON NICHOLSON, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. W82-87305-N(A), W82-78443-Y(A), and W82-87267-Y(A) IN THE 195TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. YEARY , J., filed a dissenting opinion in which KELLER , P.J. joined. SLAUGHTER , J., dissented. OPINION A jury convicted Applicant, in 1982, of burglary of a habitation and two offenses of aggravated sexual abuse of a child, which involved different victims. Applicant was sentenced to lengthy terms of imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions. Nicholson v. State, Nos. 05-82-01307-CR; 05-82-01308-CR; 05-82-01309-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas del. Feb 27, 1984). Applicant, through habeas counsel, filed these applications for writs of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07. Applicant contends that the State violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). The trial 2 court has entered findings and recommends, with the State’s agreement, that this Court grant habeas relief. The trial court’s findings and recommendation are supported by the record. Relief is granted. The judgments in cause numbers F82-87267-PN, F82-87305-PN, and F8278443-QN, in the 195th District Court of Dallas County, are set aside. Applicant shall answer the charges as set out in the indictments. The record shows that Applicant is on parole release. The trial court shall issue any necessary orders within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Delivered: November 10, 2021 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.