WARD, WENDELL Appeal from 195th District Court of Dallas County (other per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-88,438-03 & WR-88,438-05 EX PARTE WENDELL WARD, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. NOS. W0471691A & W0471691C IN THE 195TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Applicant pleaded guilty to injury to a child and was sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed these applications for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . art. 11.07. The trial court construed the second writ application as a supplement to the initial writ application. Applicant raises claims challenging the validity of his conviction and his sentence. He alleges he is serving a sentence that does not fall within the applicable range of punishment. Based on the record, the trial court has determined that Applicant is serving an illegal sentence. The trial court recommends denying relief on the claims challenging the validity of the conviction. We agree with the trial court’s findings. Applicant’s claims relating to the validity of his conviction are denied. 2 With respect to Applicant’s punishment, relief is granted . Ex parte Pue, 552 S.W.3d 226, 228 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018); Ex parte Parrott, 396 S.W.3d 531, 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The sentence in cause number F-04-71691-N in the 195th District Court of Dallas County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Dallas County for new punishment proceedings. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Delivered: February 24, 2021 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.