MCNABB, FRANK PHILLIP AKA MCNABB, PHILLIP AKA MCNABB, FRANK P. Appeal from 415th District Court of Parker County (other per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-40,402-02 EX PARTE FRANK PHILLIP MCNABB, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR18-0455-01 IN THE 415TH DISTRICT COURT FROM PARKER COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver more than four grams, less than two hundred grams, and sentenced to sixty-five years’ imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. McNabb v. State, No. 07-19-00225-CR (Tex. App. — Amarillo, Aug. 12, 2020). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Based on the record, the trial court has determined that Applicant was not timely notified of the affirmance 2 of his conviction and was deprived of his right to file a petition for discretionary review, and, therefore, Applicant is entitled to an out-of-time petition for discretionary review. Relief is granted. Ex parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Seventh Court of Appeals in cause number 08-19-00225-CR. Should Applicant decide to file a petition for discretionary review, he must file it with this Court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Delivered: April 14, 2021 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.