KING, JAMES ELWOOD JR. Appeal from 220th District Court of Comanche County (other per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0779-19 JAMES ELWOOD KING, JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS COMANCHE COUNTY Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which SLAUGHTER, J., joined. OPINION Appellant was convicted of assault and sentenced to ten years in prison. In the bill of costs, the trial court assessed Appellant a $25 time payment fee. See TEX. LOCAL GOV’T CODE § 133.103. On appeal, the Court of Appeals struck a portion of that fee as being unconstitutional. King v. State, No.11-17-00179-CR, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 5902 (Tex. King - 2 App. – Eastland July 11, 2019) (not designated for publication). The State has filed a petition for discretionary review challenging the court’s constitutional analysis. We recently handed down our opinion in Dulin v. State, Nos. PD0856-19 & PD-0857-19, 2021 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 273 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 31, 2021), in which we held that the time payment fee was assessed prematurely because the pendency of appeal suspends the obligation to pay court costs. As a result, there was no need to reach the State’s constitutional arguments. We grant review on our own motion of the following ground: Should the “Time Payment Fee” be struck as prematurely assessed? Addressing that ground in light of Dulin, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for proceedings consistent with this opinion. The State’s petition is refused. DELIVERED May 12, 2021 DO NOT PUBLISH
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
