JACKSON, RAUL DAVID Appeal from Criminal District Court 4 of Dallas County of Dallas County (other per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-73,697-06, 73,697-07, 73,697-08 & 73,697-09 EX PARTE RAUL DAVID JACKSON, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. W06-00448-K(B), W06-00445-K(B), W06-00450-K(B) & W06-00453-K(B) IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4 FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. YEARY , J., filed a dissenting opinion joined by KEASLER , J. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of possession with the intent to deliver a controlled substance and three counts of delivery of a controlled substance. He was sentenced to imprisonment for forty-five, thirty, twenty-five, and twenty years. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Jackson v. State, Nos. 05-1001190-CR, 05-10-01191-CR, 05-10-01192-CR & 05-10-01193-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 22, 2012) (not designated for publication). 2 Applicant contends, among other things, that his convictions violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. The trial court made findings of fact, concluded that Applicant’s convictions violate the Double Jeopardy Clause, and recommended that this Court grant relief. We agree that Applicant is entitled to relief on double jeopardy grounds. Relief is granted. The judgments in cause numbers F-06-00448-K, F-06-00445-TK, F-06-00450-K, and F-06-00453-K in Criminal District Court No. 4 of Dallas County are set aside, and the indictments are dismissed with prejudice. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Filed: October 3, 2018 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.