MILLER, NATHAN DEAN Appeal from 176th District Court of Harris County (other per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,510-02 EX PARTE NATHAN DEAN MILLER, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1053472-A IN THE 176TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY Per curiam. Yeary, J., filed a dissenting opinion. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to online solicitation of a minor under Section 33.021(b) of the Texas Penal Code, and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant contends that he is actually innocent, and that his conviction is void based on this Court’s opinion in Ex parte Lo, 424 S.W.3d 10, 19 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013), holding that Section 33.021(b) is unconstitutionally overbroad. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. This Court recently held that relief under the circumstances described by Applicant is not 2 available under an actual innocence theory. Ex parte Fournier, No. WR-82,102-01, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 28, 2015). However, Applicant is entitled to relief under Lo and our subsequent decision in Ex parte Chance, 439 S.W.3d 918 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 1053472 in the 176th District Court of Harris County is set aside, and the cause is remanded so the trial court can dismiss the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Delivered: January 13, 2016 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.