EX PARTE DAMON WEST, Applicant (Other)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-78,439-02 EX PARTE DAMON WEST, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F-0900248-Y IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 7 FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of engaging in organized criminal activity and sentenced to imprisonment for sixty-five years. Applicant alleges that counsel was ineffective at the punishment phase of trial. After a live evidentiary hearing presided over by a writ master, the trial court signed findings of fact and conclusions of law recommending that relief be denied. After the writ application was forwarded to this Court, the trial court granted Applicant s motion to recuse. The trial court found that this matter should be considered by another district court judge and that recusal is appropriate in this case. We remand this application to Criminal District Court No. 7 of Dallas County to allow the Presiding Judge of the First Administrative Judicial Region to assign a judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues raised by the application. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: June 11, 2014 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.