EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER RYAN TROLLINGER, Applicant (Other)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-31,852-03 EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER RYAN TROLLINGER, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 13,765 IN THE 258TH DISTRICT COURT FROM POLK COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon and one count of aggravated assault. He was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment for the unlawful possession of a firearm count and sixty years imprisonment for the aggravated assault. He did not appeal his conviction. This Court has previously remanded this matter three times to the trial court to obtain more information and findings of fact. Following the first remand, the trial court entered findings of fact that were not supported by the record. The second remand produced an unofficial record of the trial, -2but no additional findings of fact. After the third remand, the trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law, citing evidence and testimony from a habeas hearing conducted on March 26, 2014, pursuant to this Court s third remand order. However, the habeas record does not contain a transcript of that hearing. The trial court shall supplement the habeas record with a transcript of the habeas hearing conducted on March 26, 2014. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has supplemented the habeas record with a transcript of the habeas hearing. The supplemental record containing the transcription of the court reporter s notes from the habeas hearing shall be forwarded to this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: June 11, 2014 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.